<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Cross-Validation on Juntak Noh — AI Notes</title>
    <link>https://ai.klavierhye.cc/tags/cross-validation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Cross-Validation on Juntak Noh — AI Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.7</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ai.klavierhye.cc/tags/cross-validation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Bias–Variance and How to Actually Diagnose Overfitting</title>
      <link>https://ai.klavierhye.cc/posts/bias-variance-overfitting-diagnosis/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ai.klavierhye.cc/posts/bias-variance-overfitting-diagnosis/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone can recite &amp;ldquo;high bias is underfitting, high variance is overfitting.&amp;rdquo; Far fewer can look at a training run and say &lt;em&gt;which one they have&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;what to do about it&lt;/em&gt;. This post does both: first the bias–variance decomposition tightly enough to be useful, then a practical playbook — learning curves, the train/validation gap, cross-validation, and the traps — for diagnosing overfitting on a real model. It&amp;rsquo;s the diagnostic companion to the &lt;a href=&#34;https://ai.klavierhye.cc/posts/l1-l2-regularization/&#34;&gt;L1/L2&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&#34;https://ai.klavierhye.cc/posts/dropout-generalization/&#34;&gt;dropout&lt;/a&gt; posts, which cover the &lt;em&gt;fixes&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
